![]() Since they rely on Jenkins for their builds, they created the transition between Jenkins and Spinnaker stages to be seamless. Part of the reason Spinnaker has the features it does is that Jenkins’ Pipeline functionality was not available to Netflix when they began building Spinnaker. As a use-case, some groups at Netflix use Spinnaker and Jenkins. Jenkins is a build tool, and Spinnaker allows for easy deployment. Spinnaker and Jenkins, however, can work well together. Jenkins’ plugins and native configurations offer resource-level access control.Spinnaker has no fine-grained access controls.Since it was built to manage Netflix’s entire cloud management platform, there is little to no need for sprawled tools to support delivery or infrastructure management.From the same UI as your delivery tool, you can create basic resources such as VMs, load balancers, and clusters This web UI can not only provision resources, but it can do it in multiple cloud environments. Spinnaker was built to make it easy to do highly-available, multi-account, multi-cloud artifact deployment.What Spinnaker does well is takes a piece of software that has been published (whether that is a Debian package, a docker image, or a deployable JAR) and runs it through a highly-customized, predictable deployment cycle.Spinnaker has a richer deployment model.And, since it wasn’t built with the cloud in mind, this is particularly true of the cloud Though Jenkins has extensive plugin support, it can fall short as a complete deployment tool.Jenkins has extensive plugin support, so it has a lot of flexibility.This means it has an all-in-one dashboard to monitor compilation, baking, and deployment as well as resource management for multiple cloud environments Spinnaker was built as a cloud-agnostic, cohesive package, with all the capabilities of an existing deployment/management tool.It does not need custom code or glue scripts and offers native support for basic and advanced deployments This means that it offers built-in supports for creating load balancers, executing rollbacks, and resizing clusters. Spinnaker was built specifically to combine CI and CD for cloud deployments, and Spinnaker has a cloud-centered view.Jenkins was not designed for cloud deployment.It was originally built for continuous integration (CI) Since Jenkins was not originally built for CD, its CD functionality is more of an afterthought.Because Spinnaker was not intended to be a build tool, there are things that Jenkins will do better, such as managing SCM, running tests, and building packages.Instead, it can make a deploy phase more flexible It was never intended to fully replace Jenkins at a compilation level. It integrates with existing build tools, like Jenkins, to start jobs and monitor progress and results, but it was never intended to be a build tool. Here are some of the key differences between them: Originally, Jenkins was not built specifically for continuous delivery, but the Jenkins 2.0 release had an added focus on CD. Some people use Spinnaker and Jenkins together since Spinnaker has a native Jenkins API, which delegates compilation and packaging.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |